#Backblaze vs archive

I would add an extra step to upload the files to B2 at the same time, and so to incrementally add to the cloud backup form my archive as time permits. Backblaze and CrashPlan are two backup providers with unlimited backup space that cater to very different customers. My workflow sees me keep work on a 'work drive' until the job is complete, then it is moved to the raid device and then the raid device is backed up before any files are deleted from the work drive.

In addition, a B2 user can pay to upgrade their support plan to include phone service, 24x7 support and more. It would seem that Backblaze Personal would be better value for money as I can upload unlimited data for the one cost but I'm wondering whether B2 might give me more control. All B2 Cloud Storage active account owners can contact Backblaze support at, where they will also find a free-to-use knowledge base of B2 Cloud Storage advice, guides, and more. However, they rely on the user putting files into specific (folders). Sync services provide a quick way to sync data across multiple devices, and often include a sharing component as well. I run two RAID arrays, one for my clients files and one for my personal projects. Join 435 million others and get award-winning free antivirus for PC, Mac & Android. Cloud Sync Services Backup services run automatically in the background, capturing all new and updated data and backing them up to the cloud.

I'm not talking about my computer files, documents and such, they are already mostly in iCloud or Nextcloud, but my image files. So I'm thinking the time is right to add some cloud backup of my files. One thing that's missing since I am now operating from home is an offsite backup. The two services are comparable, assuming one file version per day, except Backblaze lets you pay 2 per month to extend your file versioning to a full year. Hi, I'm a photographer with a pretty good backup regime on my files going.